![]() "I think it's important that that is continued as we move forward. "I think that's a bedrock principle of what we are doing and what we've built into this," he said. Regardless what happens with realignment, Mid-American Conference commissioner Jon Steinbrecher said that moving forward, the principle of honoring conference champions should remain important. I understand the issue of money, it's based on TV deal, but guys are willing to go for virtually nothing because they feel they need that branding. It's the idea there's this desperation now because of the P5 branding. "When we heard Stanford and Cal have no place to go, well, that's not true," he said, "They had a place to go. None of this is really healthy when it drags on, but we have a great relationship with SMU."Īresco said the Power 5 label is "all about branding." I don't think it can go on too much longer. "We had a major meeting today with our ADs and presidents this morning. "We're weighing how we're going to deal with that," he said. No one knows how conference realignment is going to wind up, and it would just be premature to make any decisions about it."Īmerican Athletic Conference commissioner Mike Aresco said his conference should know "fairly soon" if SMU is going to join the ACC, and that his league has "contingency plans." "We're going to have to wait until the dust settles before making any decisions about how that might affect CFP. "To the matter of conference realignment, we're going to have to wait and see," Hancock said. He participated in the five-hour meeting by videoconference and didn't provide the room any update on possible conference expansion, according to CFP executive director Bill Hancock. The ACC is expected to decide soon on potentially adding Cal, Stanford and SMU.ĪCC commissioner Jim Phillips was expected to join them in person but told ESPN he didn't because of travel issues in Charlotte, North Carolina, caused by Hurricane Idalia. No major decisions were made Wednesday, though, because the group is still waiting to see what happens to the four remaining Pac-12 teams - Cal, Stanford, Washington State and Oregon State. ![]() The group also discussed the option of 12 at-large teams. If the Pac-12 doesn't exist, though, the CFP is considering changing the criteria to the five highest-ranked conference champions, plus the next seven highest-ranked teams. The current model includes the six highest-ranked conference champions plus the next six highest-ranked teams, which allows for five Power 5 conference champions, plus one Group of 5 champ. If the Pac-12 dissolves in 2024, as many expect it to, the CFP could change how it chooses the teams in the expanded 12-team format, which also begins in 2024. IRVING, Texas - For the first time since the Pac-12 was gutted by realignment, the 10 FBS commissioners and Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick met Wednesday to discuss the future of the College Football Playoff in a meeting that was described as "cordial," but with a backdrop of uncertainty still looming over the league leaders. You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browserĬFP says no format changes until 'dust settles' on realignmentĬollege Football, California Golden Bears, Stanford Cardinal, SMU Mustangs
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |